|

Photo Prints

I ordered a number of prints of some of my photos today. Now that I have an office, I got tired of looking at the bare white walls and decided it was time to put some of my photos on display.

Let’s hope I have better luck getting these prints than we did last week. We tried to get a photo Angela had taken at a wedding printed as a gift, but apparently, she did too good a job taking the photo, as the photo department at Walmart decided they couldn’t take a chance with copyright law unless we could get the commercial photography to give us written permission to use the photo, yes the photo Angela took, not a commercial photographer.

To be fair, their website does have a copyright form that you can bring with you, but the instructions say to any bring that if you’re having a professional photo printed, and if they question the photo at the time you go to pick it up, you cannot then fill out the form in person, which seems silly.

I think the fact that it was a wedding photo, and those probably are commonly reprinted without permission, definitely caused the problem. As it was, it wasn’t that big a part of the gift so we just skipped it.

I’m having mine printed at a local photo store, and don’t have any wedding photos, so I should be alright. But I do have to ask, how ridiculous is it that even a store as large and influential as Walmart is scared of copyright lawyers? Somehow, that doesn’t seem right. Seems like if I’m the one asking them to print a photo, I’m the one who should be held liable if I don’t actually own the copyright on it. It shouldn’t be up to the printer to “guess” at what might be a violation, especially given how good amateur digital cameras have gotten over the years. It’s not too difficult to take photos that are pretty close to professional quality, it’s scary to think that I couldn’t get them printed because they’re too good. Of course, it’s equally scary that they’ll print it if I just fill out a form, isn’t giving them the picture the same thing? Doesn’t the simple act of uploading the photo assert that I own the rights to have this photo printed? So, why does the law require them to get me to sign a form, instead of just assuming that if I upload the photo, I assume the liability? More importantly, why is the form valid if I print it at home and bring it with me, but not if I sign it in the store? That’s the kind of junk that gives lawyers a bad name.

Guess I just won’t bother shooting weddings unless I decide to do it commercially. 😉

Update: I got all the prints back from Cord Camera here in town, and they all turned out rather well. One 8×10 had obviously been cut to that proportionate and served as a reminder to do that prior to uploading the next time. They simply cut equally from all sides, and while it’s still a decent photo, I would have cropped more from one side than the other. I think it changes where the eye is drawn to, making it a different photo really. It’s still good, just not the same.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Found the Limitations of Tumblr

    In my never ending quest to explore, experiment and gain experience with getting my content in front of users on their favorite social media platforms, you may recall that I created a Tumblr blog. The initial account, and the main blog, started out as a blog about sports, which quickly got moved over to what…

  • Snow Day

    I got the call early this morning, don’t come to work. Unfortunately, Angela still had to work, since they had an event planned today. She made it there safely, but we’re up to about 6 inches of snow, which has now switched over to freezing rain as of the noon hour, that will continue all…

  • | |

    Tumblr

    Recently, a friend contacted my wife and I asking about good places to start a blog. The request reminded me that while I had seen many articles talking about the success of Tumblr as a blogging platform and a community, I really hadn’t spent any time trying to figure out what the appeal is. So,…

  • |

    Lightroom Effects

    The latest trip to Richmond was not only a great time spent catching up with family I don’t get to see nearly often enough, it was also a chance to get out and shoot some photos. Coming back, it became a great chance to play around with the Lightroom 3.0 beta that I have been…

  • This Week’s Links (weekly)

    Google can use your name and photo alongside online ads, according to its new terms of service – The Next Web tags: SocNetPres MM How Spinning a Good Yarn Can Improve Document Review in e-Discovery tags: LitSupport MM Picking up your forensic toolbox and becoming your opposition’s BYOD nightmare tags: LitSupport MM Control of Personal…

  • |

    Contact forms, why bother?

    I mentioned a couple of weeks ago the question I had about Bloglines, a commenter suggested I contact them. So, I went over to the site, filled out the contact form. I got the automated reply, and two weeks later, I still have no answer. I thought about it today after seeing Ed Bott’s post…

One Comment

  1. The sad part is – in the era of digital photos – it really isn’t that difficult to verify what camera took the shot, presuming that your delivering a digital file to them for the prints. They really need to look into a different method of verification.

    For WalMart’s part, sounds like TOO much C.Y.A. Yeah.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)