Anti-virus built in to XP SP2?

As Dana pointed out, this is an interesting article about Microsoft adding a built-in virus scanner to Windows XP SP2. I’m torn, obviously. On one hand, for all those home users who never seem to be able to use AV properly, maybe this isn’t such a bad thing. Although many still won’t remember to update it, is it going to be automatically self-updating? If so, is that necessarily a good thing? I can see arguments either way. On the other, is it going to be like the firewall or zip utility that’s built in to XP now, where they aren’t as good as other products on the market? And is that going to force out the better products?

I also need more information on these incompatibilities with SP2 and other AV products. There’s no way the built-in virus scanner could replace all the functionality I get from Symantec Corporate Edition, but if Symantec won’t even work with SP2, I’m not going to be installing the service pack to begin with until that’s fixed. I get the feeling this is going to bear keeping a close eye on over the next few weeks and months.

Update: Some more links Re: SP2 details.

Similar Posts

  • Various things

    Avoid worms with these seven steps Media Player Classic and RealAlternative as replacements for RealOne, Windows Media Player and Quicktime. Interesting, I’ve been using JetAudio at home and it works with all the Real and Windows Media formatted stuff, but not Quicktime. I might have to check this combination out. Fair Use and Blogging Tips…

  • Hmmm

    You ever have on of those days that makes you wonder why you ever thought working with technology was a good idea? Anyone have any jobs that I could do that don’t involved dealing with users, vendors, or hosting companies? That would be sweet.. By the way, this is the first time I’ve actually been…

  • A note to end users

    Now, normally the things I write about here are for other IT folks, sharing information, commiserating about work, or software companies, stuff like that. Today, however, I want to take a moment to talk to the end users and offer up some advice. Now I offer this advice for a very simple reason. When other…

  • An Example of the Complex Pressures Facing Law Firms

    So, if you are a firm with Morgan Stanley as a client, maybe the easy thing is to just say “hey, our huge client wants us back in the office and wants to have in-person meetings, so you’ve got to come back”.

    But it’s never really that simple, is it? What do you do if your staff and lawyers really don’t want to be in the office full-time? What if some of the same people who first attracted Morgan Stanley to your firm are willing to leave to work at a firm that is more flexible?

    Now that you are only recruiting among the legal folks who want to be in the office five days a week, is your talent up to snuff to keep Morgan Stanley as a client?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)