Remote Desktop

Gee with everything else going on around here, I forgot to tell you all about my trial run with Remote Desktop last night. It’s not exactly as sure-fire simple as the Sales guys made it out to be the few times I asked about it. First I setup the XP box at work to accept incoming connections, pretty easy on that end. Then I went home and grabbed a copy of Remote Desktop Client and installed it on the laptop with Win 2000. So far, so good. I opened up the program and found the first issue, there is no place within the program itself to configure your connection settings. It assumes a connection to the internet is already present and asks for a computer name or IP address. There are no “dial-up” configurations. Hmm, problem. The work machine is not directly accessible from the internet. I go back to the MS page and read through the directions, again, all the directions assume an internet connection, not a dial-up. This is not at all what I was told. I was definitely told that you could dial directly to the PC you wanted to remotely control, but there’s no settings for the dial-up connection.

I then get an idea. What if I dialed into that computer, connected to it using DUN, and then tried to open up the Remote Desktop connection using the IP address? Bingo! That’s the way it works for a direct telephone connection! (Don’t look for the documentation for that, I never did find it!) So after all of that just to get connected, I was in no mood to play around with it too much, but I managed to get it loaded and run a database query to see how quickly it would run. The initial loading of the remote screen is slow over the dialup. I’m not sure how much of that is due to XP’s more intense use of graphics, but it was slow. Once the screen loaded though, speed was pretty good. I ran the database query and it ran on the remote system, so it was at the same speed I would normally get at work, and the resulting screen came across the phone line just as quickly. I checked Outlook and opened up a game of freecell and everything seemed pretty good. So I figure it’ll be good for working from home at times, I just need to factor in the slow startup. (Grab a sandwich or beer or whatever while the screen loads, eh? *L*)

OK back to re-imaging my old machine, it’s almost done..:)

Similar Posts

  • Blogger changes

    Wow, I went to Blogger this evening and caught a glimpse of their changes. They now support individual archives and comments. Pretty cool. And the layout of the site is entirely different. It’ll take some time to get used to, I’m sure, but it’s nice that they’re adding features, if nothing else! I’m not sure…

  • Sneak preview

    While I don’t have the time to do every page, because the navigation bar will probably be slightly different when you’re on different pages, I did manage to put together a little test of what the static pages are going to look like here. The blog will probably end up with something like that at…

  • Home again

    Yeah we’re home again after spending the long weekend visiting the in-laws. We had a good time, spent some time relaxing, watched some college football, did some shopping and ate a lot! Tomorrow it’s back to work and it should be another day of physical labor. All that stuff we spent time packing and getting…

  • Quick Thought – Meeting Free Days Also Say Something About Your Workplace Culture

    Yes, I am on record as saying that the most important thing in a remote workplace is communication, in fact, I’m a fan of over-communicating. That doesn’t have to mean more meetings though. It can, honestly, just mean making use of all of the communication tools we have, especially when the discussion does not need to be had in real-time. 

    If you make Monday “meeting-free” but cram five days’ worth of meetings into the other four days of the week, you’re not helping the situation. You’re just rearranging deck chairs. The real change comes in figuring out how to make do with less meeting time, by taking advantage of alternatives when that makes sense, and by learning how to have more efficient meetings. (Start by not scheduling every meeting for 1 hour, for example. A 10-minute conversation can be a 10-minute meeting. There is no law that says all meetings must be divisible into 30-minute increments just because your Outlook calendar defaults to that.)

  • Unveiling

    It’s about time for the great unveiling of the new name of this blog. As you’ll recall I asked for suggestions and promised to give away a PC World subscription to the person who’s suggestion I used. Naturally, it turned out to be a bit more complicated than that. Two people sent in suggestions that…

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To respond on your own website, enter the URL of your response which should contain a link to this post's permalink URL. Your response will then appear (possibly after moderation) on this page. Want to update or remove your response? Update or delete your post and re-enter your post's URL again. (Find out more about Webmentions.)