The auto post from Diigo seems to be on the fritz today, so I’m adding this weeks links by hand. I apologize for the lack of further formatting.
- An Advantage of Former IT in Litigation Support
- The Basics of How Technology Assisted Review (TAR) Works – and Why Continuo
- Get Free IT Training with Microsoft Virtual Academy
- Six Common Review & Productions Problems and How to Fix Them
- 10 Gmail Plugins That Improve Email Productivity
- Production from a Provider’s Point of View
- Jones Day Attorney Misconduct Shows Rotten State of Obstructionist Discovery in America
If you’re not familiar with TrueCrypt, it a free utility that you can use to encrypt your data. I’ve used it for years, lots of people in the eDiscovery world have used it for years, among many other tech professionals, and I would imagine they continue to use it.
Given the large user base, and the nature of the tool to begin with, the current state of affairs is a huge concern. As ArsTechnica explains:
One of the official webpages for the widely used TrueCrypt encryption program says that development has abruptly ended and warns users of the decade-old tool that it isn’t safe to use.
“WARNING: Using TrueCrypt is not secure as it may contain unfixed security issues,” text in red at the top of TrueCrypt page on SourceForge states. The page continues: “This page exists only to help migrate existing data encrypted by TrueCrypt. The development of TrueCrypt was ended in 5/2014 after Microsoft terminated support of Windows XP. Windows 8/7/Vista and later offer integrated support for encrypted disks and virtual disk images. Such integrated support is also available on other platforms (click here for more information). You should migrate any data encrypted by TrueCrypt to encrypted disks or virtual disk images supported on your platform.”
So has the site been hacked? Is this a hoax? Are they really suggesting that everyone should stop using their software with no further comment or explanation? Who knows? It certainly bears watching for those of us who’ve been using it!Tags: eDiscovery, Microsoft, Security
I’ll be honest, I’ve always had a good feeling for Microsoft’s OneNote application. The only reason I have used Evernote instead of it was because the copies of OneNote that I’ve had over the years have all been part of MS Office, which I “owned” by way of the company I worked for at the time. Not wanting to be left high and dry should I move to a company that didn’t provide OneNote, I’ve always opted to use the free version of Evernote to keep notes and have them synched up whether I was using my PC, my MacBook, my iPad or just a web browser from any computer.
Now that Microsoft has basically given OneNote the same treatment, I’m tempted to switch. Except, I also really like Evernote. And Evernote already has all of my stuff. Perhaps I can start playing around with both and figure out some way to keep some things in OneNote and some things in Evernote.
That’s the take Computerworld had on it, which I found pretty interesting:
If you’re primarily looking for a tool that lets you easily capture, organize and find content from the Web, you’ll clearly want Evernote, because its tools for doing that are exemplary. If you instead want to create notes from scratch and have them in well-organized notebooks, clearly OneNote is the way to go.
Then again, you may be like me. I’ve been using both of them for years. OneNote is my go-to tool for organizing and taking notes for projects such as books and articles. I use Evernote for research. Given that they’re now both free, it gives me the best of both worlds.
Personally, I’m hard pressed to find a clear delineation. I’m already using Penultimate on the iPad for handwritten notes in Evernote, does ONeNote give me anything I don’t get there? Should OneNote be my go-to for longer form organization? Which one do you use? Why? Would you consider using both at some point?Tags: Evernote, iPad, Microsoft, OneNote
I’ve talked before about Google’s actions regarding pushing it’s social network down everyone’s throats whenever you try and use what used to be an unrelated Google tool. The recent kerfuffle over Google allowing Plus users to send an email to your Gmail account without knowing the address unless you take the time to opt out was no surprise to me. Google’s trying to build the ultimate walled garden, and collect everything about us in one place, surely they were not about to leave Gmail users alone when that was such a rich way to push for even more integration with Plus.
Recently, though, I’ve been thinking more about business users though, particularly companies that use Google Apps. It started with the closure, or rather the migration of Google Talk into Hangouts. Oh sure, Talk is still around, barely. You really have to go out of your way to use Talk instead of initiating a hangout. (For example, you have to find an older version of the Android App, the current one uses Hangouts.) Hangouts, of course, require a Google Plus profile. I have no doubt that, eventually, my use of Google Talk for work is going to require a Google Plus profile, tied to my work email address, which is hosted by Google Apps.
But, I don’t want a Plus profile tied to my work address. I have a profile that is tied to my personal online endeavors, like this site. I don’t want that to be part of what people see when I’m just trying to collaborate on a document with them either. I just want to use my Google Apps account to work, without any social network needed.
That was one of the reasons Derrick Wlodarz listed as reasons he moved away from Google Apps to Microsoft Office 365:
At face value, Google’s core Apps offerings in the form of Gmail, Docs/Drive, Sites, and Hangouts are fairly solid offerings. But as a collective whole, they lack a certain polish. That x-factor which takes a platform from just good or great, to excellent. Google’s way is just that — the Google way or the highway.
This in-or-out dilemma exists in many facets in the Google Apps realm. For example, using Google’s Hangouts functionality for video and voice chat requires you to have a Google+ account activated. It’s basically a Google account that is opted into Google’s social network, Google+.
I have nothing against Google+ as I find it vibrantly different and more gratifying than Facebook these days, but forcing your meeting participants to all have Google+ enabled on top of having Google accounts as well? That’s more than a bit self serving if you ask me.
I think this really illustrates the problem. If I were in charge of making this decision, I wouldn’t want everyone in my company to be forced into having a Google Plus profile just to accomplish their work, let alone make my customers create on to collaborate with us as well. It simply opens up too many questions that I don’t want to deal with. (Can the employees just use an existing personal Google Plus account? If so, how do I prevent them from saying something, or joining in a community that my customers, or other employees find offensive? If I don’t let them tie the profile together, I have to trust that they will keep track of which profile they are using at all times. Do I want that? When they leave my company, what do I do with the profile now? I own it, but while they are using it to interact with any/all of Google’s services, how do I want them to act?)
See, this is an area I’d rather not get into, but if I’m an Apps user, I think it’s just a matter of time. Right now, I have a Plus profile, and it’s fairly clear that though it lists where I work, it belongs to me. If I create one with my work email address, that doesn’t belong to me, but I’m still the one responsible it for now, and I really don’t want to be. It’s just something else to worry about.
So if it were me, a platform that didn’t throw me into this situation might look pretty appealing, no? Then again, I’ll go back to the one truth about Google. They are an advertising company, everything else is just a side business, including Apps.Tags: Facebook, Gmail, Google, Microsoft