<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going to be Changing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikemcbrideonline.com/2010/01/going-to-be-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikemcbrideonline.com/2010/01/going-to-be-changing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:23:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Fahrni</title>
		<link>http://mikemcbrideonline.com/2010/01/going-to-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Fahrni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemcbrideonline.com/2010/01/going-to-be-changing/#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I think WordPress is a FINE choice. I&#039;ve been struggling with that one myself. WordPress is by far the most popular, it has the best user interface, it&#039;s the most powerful, but it lacks ONE thing that keeps me from using it; static publishing. My brother, http://jerryfahrni.com, has been using WordPress for about a year not and he&#039;s had great success with it. In fact he gave me grief for not choosing it! :-)

The updated site looks good, and obviously it wasn&#039;t hard to make the transition. 

I&#039;m still evaluating things. If I go with the &quot;hosted on their servers&quot; option I&#039;d probably go with Tumblr. My current front runner for &quot;self hosted&quot; is Movable Type 5. They have a very powerful publishing engine, CMS, and they publish static pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I think WordPress is a FINE choice. I&#8217;ve been struggling with that one myself. WordPress is by far the most popular, it has the best user interface, it&#8217;s the most powerful, but it lacks ONE thing that keeps me from using it; static publishing. My brother, <a href="http://jerryfahrni.com" rel="nofollow">http://jerryfahrni.com</a>, has been using WordPress for about a year not and he&#8217;s had great success with it. In fact he gave me grief for not choosing it! <img src='http://mikemcbrideonline.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The updated site looks good, and obviously it wasn&#8217;t hard to make the transition. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still evaluating things. If I go with the &#8220;hosted on their servers&#8221; option I&#8217;d probably go with Tumblr. My current front runner for &#8220;self hosted&#8221; is Movable Type 5. They have a very powerful publishing engine, CMS, and they publish static pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absoblogginlutely!</title>
		<link>http://mikemcbrideonline.com/2010/01/going-to-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Absoblogginlutely!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikemcbrideonline.com/2010/01/going-to-be-changing/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Thats good news (both that you&#039;re moving to Wordpress) and that you are busy at work. Hopefully the transition goes smoothly - I know it took me a while to get mine moved when I went from MovableType.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats good news (both that you&#39;re moving to WordPress) and that you are busy at work. Hopefully the transition goes smoothly &#8211; I know it took me a while to get mine moved when I went from MovableType.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

