When I saw the announcement last night about Flickr now offering one terabyte of storage for their free accounts, I wondered just what it was that they would offer for those of us with Pro accounts to continue paying. It turns out, they aren’t offering much. The existing Pro accounts stay the same, but appear to be going away come August, or at least that’s my reading of the announcement and the FAQ, but I may be wrong about that.). Then you’ll have the option to downgrade to a free account, or upgrade to an “Ad-Free” account, for $49.99 per year. The Ad-Free option only shows two extra features over the free accounts, no ads, and the availability of stats. That’s it. You don’t get more storage options or anything else, just the pleasure of not seeing ads and being able to see stats of your photo views.

That doesn’t seem like a whole lot, especially given the higher price when compared to the old Pro accounts, which gave you unlimited storage. (I’ve yet been able to determine whether the new free accounts have the same limits to the number of sets/collections that the old free accounts had, if anyone from Yahoo! wants to comment and let me know, I’d appreciate it!) The small advantages being given for No-Ads accounts make me wonder. There’s also a Doublr account, which offers you 2TB of storage for almost $500 per year, which is straight out of the question for an amateur like me. So are they trying to encourage Pro users to pay the extra, or to actually downgrade to see advertising again? It almost seems that way, doesn’t it?

Obviously, I don’t believe a service like Yahoo! is going to simply decide one day that they should really be offering more free services, and encourage paying customers to move to free accounts, just because. They have a reason, and I truly believe the reason for this is that they either make more money from advertising than they do from the Pro accounts, or they want to leverage Flickr user’s information across their entire network, and strengthen the targeted advertising they can sell, much in the way Google already does, and continues to push by forcing Plus on all of their users across all of their tools. More on that some other time.

Given where they hired their new CEO from, I would not be surprised that this is the strategy here. Yahoo! knows that Flickr Pro account holders have gotten used to not seeing ads, and using stats, so they are still offering it, but they are making it harder to justify continuing to pay for the ad-free account, by raising the price, and limiting the advantages. That tells me they want us to see ads, not to pay for the service. How that sort of marketing plan affects the idea of using web services going forward will remain to be seen, but it’s become clear that the real money is in information gathering and targeted advertising, not in offering a paid service. We can see this playing out on social networks already, it will be interesting to see how it evolves going forward.

• How To Protect Yourself From Online Services Shutting Down

  tags: Tech MM

• What is Litigation Support? Help Desk / IT Support | Litigation Support Guru

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Passengers brace for another summer of airline fees

  tags: Travel MM

• Fibs your e-discovery vendor and law firm may tell you—Part 2

  tags: LitSupport MM

• What is in the Way of Developing Great Conversation Skills? (Part 2)

  tags: Management MM

• Meet & Confer at 10 Paces

  tags: LitSupport MM

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

I know that the end of Google Reader is almost upon us. I’ve been a little too busy to spend much time experimenting with various tools that might become my new RSS reader. I’ve briefly looked at a few, but there have definitely been a few things that I’ve liked, some others that I didn’t. As I looked around, I really didn’t see anything that offered me what I have had for years in Google Reader.

Until today. I stumbled upon The Old Reader. The Old Reader is trying to replicate not just the current Google Reader experience, but also the sharing features that Google removed from Reader long ago. I instantly uploaded a copy of my Google Reader subscriptions and had the same folder structure and all my feeds in Old Reader about 15 minutes later.

So far, so good. Obviously, I will need a few more days of using Old Reader exclusively in place of Google Reader before I make any final decision, but I think there’s a strong chance that this is where I’m moving my RSS reading to.

What have you moved to since Google announced the shuttering of Reader?

• Lead up

  tags: Management MM

• Probative Value Versus Burden: eDiscovery Of Metadata

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Are Your Training “Virtually” Blind?

  tags: training MM

• Work Smarter Not Harder

  tags: LitSupport MM

• An In-House Perspective on Taking Greater Control of the E-Discovery Process

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Skip the HASH When Deduping Outlook MSG Files

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Roundup of Thoughts on the Enron Data Set PII

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Bad Robot!

  tags: LitSupport MM

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

• eDiscovery Pricing Models – Part 2: Making Sense of the Mess

  tags: LitSupport MM

• 8 E-Discovery Tips For Small Firms and Companies

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Stop Telling Your Employees What to Do

  tags: Management MM

• Minnesota Implements Changes to eDiscovery Rules

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Insights from eDJ Group’s Dallas Legal Hold Boot Camp

  tags: LitSupport MM

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Let me first say, that this is really just my opinion, and I do not speak for all introverts, or for all trainers, or for all bloggers.

Last week, I was in Vegas for our annual User’s Conference at the Aria Resort and Hotel. As with most conferences, when you work for the company putting on the conference, and are tasked with presenting various sessions during the conference, there is very little of what you might call down time. In fact, I arrived at the hotel on Saturday, and never even really had a chance to go outside until Weds. evening. And go, I did. Because as much as I enjoy training, meeting with customers, and talking eDiscovery with a variety of people, as an introvert there is only so long that I can be “on” before I just get exhausted.

So when some free time opened up on Weds. I left the hotel in search of somewhere I could have dinner without anyone recognizing me, wanting to talk about our products, or the conference sessions. I craved the opportunity to simply be anonymous for a couple of hours, and left alone. Again, this is not because I don’t enjoy those interactions, but introverts have to work hard in any social situation, even ones that we enjoy, and eventually all that work just catches up with us. We spend far more time thinking about what we say and how we come across than extroverts, and require time to recharge our mental energy, away from other people. Vegas is a great place to be an introvert generally, because everyone is doing their own thing and really paying no attention to you, allowing you to be out, and yet still recharge your social interaction energy levels. Such was the case that evening.

The introduction of wearable tech, especially with facial recognition, is going to change that. Every time I step outside there will be the chance that someone will spot me, decide to do a little facial recognition, look me up on LinkedIn, or find the blog, and suddenly I’m no longer just another nameless person who happens to be eating dinner, I’m Mike McBride, ediscovery software trainer, blogger, amateur photographer, traveler, etc. and let’s face it, if you share an interest, or want to talk about one of the things I do, you’ll come and talk to me about it. That’s the point of wearing the tech and looking people up in the first place, isn’t it?

Not that I think there is a very high risk of someone bothering to look me up, but the risk is still there and as this kind of technology becomes more widespread, I will be forced to adapt my expectations of “down time”. I will have to expect that I am no longer anonymous, but that anyone could know who I am and be tying my online life to my actions as I eat a meal, or walk down a street. Am I dumb enough to be doing anything out in public that would be embarrassing professionally or personally? Of course not, but we all know that people behave, and feel, differently when they know they are being watched. Introverts feel that need to be “on” when being watched, and instead of recharging our social energy, we wind up depleting it just by virtue of being in a public place.

Of course, for me, the risk is probably fairly small, but I will still be aware of it and it will absolutely affect me and the things I do to recharge my social energy levels. What about people who are more recognizable who are introverts? What about attractive women who are introverts? Do you really think they won’t have folks “Googling” them as a way to find an excuse to talk to them?

Unfortunately, for all the cool, “wow”, things wearable tech and facial recognition could do, they also will absolutely result in the following things as well:

• Socially awkward guys using information gleaned from online profiles to stalk, harass, hit on, or do worse to, attractive females they happen to run across in public. Or vice versa.
• Small actions seen in public taken out of context, and used to embarrass people on social networks, or potentially as blackmail.
• Photos taken in public places by complete strangers being tied to social network profiles. (Imagine if People of Walmart could actually identify the people in the photos, for example.)
• An overall change in public behavior. If everything could be recorded, how we interact socially will have to change. The free exchange of ideas that generally only happens in private now, for fear of public repercussions, will cease to exist.
• More and more people, and groups, becoming socially outcast as their actions are recorded, shared, linked to their identity, and ridiculed.
• Introverts will revert to spending more time alone, and withdrawing from society bit by bit, as they lose the ability to recharge outside of their own home.

That last point is an important one. The reality is that soon, you will have to make a choice between having an online presence, which is so important for your career as a knowledge worker, and adjusting your behavior to minimize the impact of wearable tech on your privacy, or simply dropping out of the online world altogether. (If you don’t have any online profiles, people using Glass can’t find out who you are.). Neither of these are good choices for an introvert. They are both very limiting, and force you to withdraw from the life you may lead now. We are being forced to this choice by the extroverted and tech crowds who are suspicious of people who don’t want to be “out there” all the time. The technology exists so you’re just going to have to get used to everyone using it all the time.

To them I can only say, that having something to hide, and wanting to be left alone, are not one and the same.

• eDiscovery Daily Blog: You Don’t Have to Be Rich to Use Richcopy – eDiscovery Best Practices

  tags: Tech MM LitSupport

• ADUC 2013: Day Two Round-Up – eDiscovery Insight

  tags: LitSupport MM

• What You Don’t Know About Secure E-discovery

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Smartphone Forensic Alibi

  tags: Forensics LitSupport MM

• ADUC 2013: Day One Round-Up – eDiscovery Insight

  tags: LitSupport MM

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

• Travel delays ahead: FAA furloughs begin soon

  tags: travel MM

• New Federal E-Discovery Rules Move a Step Closer to Fruition

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Are We on the Cusp of Major Changes to E-Discovery Rules?

  tags: LitSupport MM

• Flight Search Engines And The Multi-City Ripoff

  tags: MM travel

• 20 eDiscovery Blogs for Legal Professionals to Follow

  tags: MM LitSupport

• April 15 – are you an eDiscovery procrastinator?

  tags: MM LitSupport

• Project Management: The Human Hand That Guides E-Discovery

  tags: MM LitSupport

• Managing stupid(ly)

  tags: Management MM

• Borg Challenge: Part Five where I summarize my findings |

  tags: LitSupport MM

• E-Discovery: Savings in the Cloud

  tags: LitSupport MM

• BYOD and Social Media Changing the E-Discovery Landscape | E-Discovery Beat

  tags: LitSupport MM

Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

I noticed something interesting yesterday. Like any other day, I had clicked over to an article, and after reading the article, I saw some of the comments being made about it. Mind you, the comments sections of many major news sites are generally the kind of place I would think about wondering into only when I felt like I had too much optimism about the human race and needed to quell that a bit. But something in there caught my eye, and made me wonder about something. I decided I needed to take a sample.

So I went back to the “headlines” area and looked for obvious political or cultural stories. The kind that usually attract the real trolls. Sure enough, they were there. There were posts spouting political positions of all kinds, personal attacks against other commenters, folks who felt no qualms about spouting hateful opinions about overweight people and on and on.

The only difference on this site, was that the articles being commented on were in the “influencers” section of LinkedIn, and all of the commenters were identified using their LinkedIn profile and the company they work for was listed right there, with their comments.

Talk about a way to really give your company a bad name. Talk about a way to run afoul of your company’s social media policies. Talk about an easy way to find yourself fired, or find your company being boycotted, or talk about a way for your company to face a PR nightmare. This isn’t some random website where you appear as some anonymous person and it would require a ton of work to track you down. This is freaking LinkedIn!

I avoid making just about any political or social comments here because a lot of people do know where I work, and it’s easy to find out if you don’t. Plus I really don’t think it’s possible to have intelligence conversations about either online, but I surely would never say anything close to controversial when my title and company are attached to it! Obviously, not everyone has really thought this through.

That’s the news from the Googlesphere, that Blogger users will now be able to bring in Google Plus conversations into the comments of their blogs.

On one hand, this makes sense, and might be quite useful for Blogger users who are also active on Google+. I hope they enjoy being able to extend their blog conversations into Plus and vice versa.

On the other hand, this just goes to show how much of Google is a completely closed system. Sure, you can bring in comments from Google owned Plus into Google owned Blogger. But what if you want to bring in comments to Blogger from Facebook, Twitter, etc.? What if, as a WordPress user, you want to bring in comments from Plus?

Look, this is a nice feature for Blogger users, but let’s not kid ourselves. This is also part of Google’s larger strategy to be your one stop “everything” shop, and to share data about you and your actions online across all of their products. Think about it, what better way for Google to target advertising to you (And let’s not forget that at the very base level, Google is an advertising company), than to know what blogs you comment on, and what you have to say, who you’re connected to, what kinds of things are in your email messages, who those are from, what you search for online, what events are coming up on your calendar, and on and on and on? They are creating a profile of you, using the combination of your activities on all of their products, and they are keeping you behind their walled garden when you use those products. Your own site, your Twitter handle, your Facebook or LinkedIn profile? Those don’t belong to Google, and Google can’t take the identity you’ve created on Google’s products to track you in those environments. In a nutshell, allowing interoperability isn’t really in Google’s interest, so I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for it.

While I think it’s cool that they are adding interoperability from Blogger and Plus, wake me when Google actually offers up a public API so the rest of the online world can interact with Plus. Until then, Plus remains just another site I have to login to in order to see what’s happening.